Advisory
We advise private institutions, public organisations and governments on carbon and green finance strategy — from a single site's reporting duty to the design of a national monetisation programme. The work is the same at every scale: establish what is actually happening, quantify it defensibly, and build something that survives an auditor.
Who we advise
Energy and labour costs are rising while a reporting duty arrives from the other direction. The fear is capital you can't fund, and increasingly personal exposure — several waste and reporting mandates now carry penalties for individuals, not only companies.
Our answer: a first outcome that is financial, delivered before any capital decision, with the tonnes counted separately and honestly.
Your members are asking, and they will notice if the answer is thin. Heritage buildings and constrained sites make change look impossible, and a claim you can't evidence is worse than no claim at all.
Our answer: start with what the building already does. Our longest engagement of this kind, with a heritage members' club, has run since 2017.
Statutory reporting you cannot opt out of, to be delivered without new headcount. France has required carbon reporting from public establishments above 250 staff and authorities above 50,000 residents since 2023; comparable duties are arriving elsewhere.
Our answer: build on what already exists. A bounded first phase on infrastructure already in service, with reporting you can publish.
The opportunity is revenue and sovereignty at once — a system you define and price yourselves rather than inheriting someone else's rulebook. The fear is integrity scrutiny, and being blamed for a scheme that fails in public.
Our answer: design for the audit first. Your teams are trained and capability is shared throughout, so the partnership continues because it keeps adding value, not because anything depends on us.
Service lines
Designing a domestic carbon system end to end for a state or major public body: the crediting methodology, the price mechanism, registry rules, participation architecture, revenue allocation and phasing.
You receive: market-structure options with modelled scenarios · a crediting methodology · a registry retirement and anti-double-counting rule · MRV and integration architecture · a phased roadmap · a risk register with mitigations · a strategic assessment.
We have a complete national carbon-monetisation programme design prepared to sovereign standard — methodology, registry rules, revenue model and phasing. It can be walked through in detail on request.
Every solar farm makes two things: electricity, and pollution that never happened. The second is an asset most owners never claim. We identify abatement you already produce, quantify it against a defensible baseline, and route it to certification and sale.
You receive: an avoided-emissions quantification · an eligibility and additionality assessment · a certification-route recommendation · issuance under a published, version-controlled methodology · buyer access.
Why we favour generation: soil carbon, forestry and landfill gas are argued about constantly. A megawatt-hour is already metered by an instrument nobody in the dispute controls. Proving it takes a spreadsheet, not a scientist.
Getting an organisation to the point where it survives a reporting duty, an auditor and a regulator. Inventories are built from raw usage and invoice records across Scopes 1 to 3 — waste, water, gas, electricity, fuel and telecommunications.
You receive: a GHG inventory · organisational and operational boundary definition · a Greenhouse Gas Action Plan · regulatory duty mapping · a governance policy library including anti-greenwashing · automated data ingestion reporting on current published emission factors.
Frameworks: GHG Protocol · ISO 14064 · NGER (Australia) · bilan carbone / BEGES and the ADEME labellisation pathway (France) · national climate-law compliance regimes.
The profit-positive programme, run as a standing quarterly relationship across three levers: profile reset, asset optimisation and resource recovery. Each quarter closes on outcome review, KPI percentage reached, next steps.
You receive: a facility assessment and baseline · a prioritised solution set · a quarterly work programme · reviewed outcomes.
This is the line with the deepest delivery record — multi-site, multi-year, documented in both dollars and tonnes. The case studies show the workings, line by line.
Where the carbon position meets the balance sheet: which market you are actually in, which instrument you need, how a programme's own verified output can help fund its build-out rather than drawing on budget, and how to sequence domestic delivery ahead of international recognition.
You receive: jurisdiction and instrument mapping · a compliance-versus-voluntary determination · a sequencing recommendation for international recognition · counterparty and registry screening.
Frameworks: Paris Agreement Article 6.2 and 6.4 with corresponding adjustments · CORSIA · Global Carbon Council · regulated exchange and clearing routes.
How an engagement runs
Short, bounded, and it ends in a decision rather than a report.
A short conversation to establish what you hold, what obliges you, and whether we're the right counterparty. No charge.
Raw data and invoice records, not a walk-around. Nothing is recommended before the position is measured.
Routes with their trade-offs stated, including the ones that don't suit us. Costs and capital requirements named up front.
Your team is trained as we go. If we're doing our job, your dependence on us falls every quarter.
